⚠️ This AI-generated report synthesizes publicly available information. AI can make mistakes. Please double check information in this report.
Utilities | Utilities - Regulated Electric
📊 The Bottom Line
Duke Energy is a major regulated electric and gas utility in the U.S., characterized by stable demand for its essential services. Its strategic focus on infrastructure modernization and the transition to cleaner energy sources positions it for steady, albeit regulated, growth. The business model provides predictable cash flows and a reliable dividend for investors.
⚖️ Risk vs Reward
At its current price, Duke Energy appears fairly valued, trading at a trailing P/E of 19.05, close to the utility sector average. The consensus analyst target of US$134.71 suggests moderate upside, while downside risks relate to interest rate sensitivity and regulatory outcomes. The dividend yield of 3.52% provides income stability, making it attractive for conservative, long-term investors.
🚀 Why DUK Could Soar
⚠️ What Could Go Wrong
Electric Utilities & Infrastructure
92%
Revenue from generating, transmitting, and distributing electricity to customers.
Gas Utilities & Infrastructure
8%
Revenue from distributing natural gas and investing in related infrastructure.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
This diversified utility model provides stable, predictable revenue streams underpinned by regulatory frameworks. The essential nature of its services ensures consistent demand, contributing to financial resilience and dividend reliability.
As a regulated utility, Duke Energy operates in defined service territories with limited direct competition for electricity and natural gas delivery. This structure provides high barriers to entry, stable customer demand, and predictable revenue streams determined by state regulatory commissions through rate cases, ensuring a reasonable return on invested capital. This regulatory framework significantly de-risks its operations compared to competitive markets.
Duke Energy commands a vast operational scale, serving millions of customers across multiple states with an expansive network of generation, transmission, and distribution assets. This large-scale infrastructure requires substantial capital investment and maintenance, making it impractical for new entrants to replicate. Its significant asset base also provides economies of scale in operations, procurement, and regulatory compliance, reinforcing its market position.
Duke Energy is actively investing in the transition to cleaner energy, with plans to own or purchase 16,000 megawatts of renewable energy capacity by 2025 and eliminate coal usage by 2050. This proactive stance aligns with evolving environmental regulations and consumer preferences, positioning the company for long-term sustainability and access to capital for green investments. Its large nuclear generation fleet also contributes significantly to low-carbon electricity production.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
These advantages collectively ensure Duke Energy's long-term stability and profitability within the essential utilities sector. The regulated nature of its business, combined with its scale and commitment to energy transition, creates a durable moat that supports consistent earnings and dividend payouts for investors.
Harry K. Sideris
President, CEO & Director
55-year-old Harry K. Sideris leads Duke Energy as President, CEO, and Director. His experience and leadership are crucial in guiding the company through its strategic focus on infrastructure modernization, clean energy transition, and navigating the complex regulatory landscape inherent in the utility sector. His role involves balancing shareholder returns with reliable service delivery to millions of customers.
The utilities sector, particularly regulated electric and gas, operates largely as regional monopolies. Direct competition for customers within a specific service area is minimal due to high barriers to entry, including extensive infrastructure requirements and regulatory approvals. Competition primarily arises from other large, publicly traded utilities for capital, talent, and favorable regulatory treatment in new investment areas or potential mergers. Alternative energy sources and energy efficiency initiatives also present evolving competitive dynamics.
📊 Market Context
Competitor
Description
vs DUK
Southern Company (SO)
A major U.S. energy company with electric utilities in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, and natural gas distribution in several states.
Southern Company has a similar regulated utility model but serves a different geographic footprint. It also has a significant nuclear portfolio and focuses on infrastructure investment like Duke Energy.
NextEra Energy (NEE)
The world's largest electric utility holding company by market capitalization, known for its regulated utility Florida Power & Light and its large renewable energy development arm, NextEra Energy Resources.
NextEra Energy is distinguished by its aggressive renewable energy development, offering a higher growth profile compared to Duke Energy's more balanced approach to traditional and renewable assets.
American Electric Power (AEP)
One of the largest electric utilities in the U.S., serving customers across 11 states in the East and Midwest.
AEP operates across a broad geographic area similar to Duke Energy, focusing on transmission and distribution investments, but has a different generation mix and regulatory exposure.
12
8
2
Low Target
US$115
-5%
Average Target
US$135
+11%
High Target
US$146
+20%
Closing: US$121.35 (30 Jan 2026)
High Probability
If Duke Energy successfully executes its aggressive clean energy transition plans, including significant renewable energy deployment and grid modernization, it could attract greater ESG-focused investment, lower its cost of capital, and potentially secure favorable regulatory treatment for these investments, leading to enhanced earnings predictability and growth.
Medium Probability
Duke Energy's service territories in the Southeast and Midwest are experiencing population growth and economic development. This translates to increased electricity and natural gas demand, driving higher sales volumes and justifying further infrastructure investments, which in turn expand the company's rate base and future earnings capacity.
Low Probability
The regulated nature of Duke Energy's operations provides significant insulation from economic downturns, ensuring stable cash flows and predictable returns on investment. This inherent stability, coupled with consistent dividend payouts, makes it a defensive investment during volatile market periods, attracting capital seeking safety and income.
Medium Probability
Unfavorable decisions from state regulatory commissions on rate cases, particularly regarding allowed returns on equity or cost recovery for infrastructure projects, could directly limit Duke Energy's profitability and ability to invest, potentially leading to lower earnings per share and a diminished growth outlook.
High Probability
Utilities are capital-intensive and typically carry substantial debt. A sustained increase in interest rates would elevate Duke Energy's borrowing costs, compressing net income and potentially reducing the attractiveness of its dividend yield compared to rising bond yields, leading to downward pressure on its stock price.
Medium Probability
The large-scale transition to cleaner energy sources involves complex project management, potential cost overruns, and technological challenges. Delays or inefficiencies in deploying new renewable generation and modernizing the grid could lead to higher costs, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage, impacting financial performance.
Owning Duke Energy for a decade implies a belief in the enduring stability of regulated utilities and the company's ability to navigate the energy transition. Its robust infrastructure and essential services provide a strong foundation. However, success hinges on favorable regulatory environments supporting its capital investments and management's adept handling of rising interest rates and execution of clean energy initiatives. If these factors align, Duke Energy can deliver consistent, albeit moderate, returns and reliable dividends for long-term holders.
Metric
31 Dec 2024
31 Dec 2023
31 Dec 2022
Income Statement
Revenue
US$30.36B
US$29.06B
US$28.77B
Gross Profit
US$15.20B
US$13.76B
US$12.98B
Operating Income
US$7.94B
US$7.10B
US$6.42B
Net Income
US$4.52B
US$2.84B
US$2.55B
EPS (Diluted)
5.71
3.54
3.33
Balance Sheet
Cash & Equivalents
US$0.31B
US$0.25B
US$0.41B
Total Assets
US$186.34B
US$176.89B
US$178.09B
Total Debt
US$85.23B
US$80.46B
US$74.58B
Shareholders' Equity
US$50.13B
US$49.11B
US$49.32B
Key Ratios
Gross Margin
50.1%
47.3%
45.1%
Operating Margin
26.1%
24.4%
22.3%
Return on Equity
9.03
5.78
5.17
Metric
Annual (31 Dec 2025)
Annual (31 Dec 2026)
EPS Estimate
US$6.31
US$6.70
EPS Growth
+7.0%
+6.1%
Revenue Estimate
US$31.9B
US$33.1B
Revenue Growth
+5.0%
+3.8%
Number of Analysts
19
21
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.05 | The trailing twelve-month Price-to-Earnings ratio measures how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of past earnings, reflecting current valuation based on historical profitability. |
| Forward P/E | 18.12 | The forward Price-to-Earnings ratio indicates market expectations for future earnings, showing how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of anticipated future profits. |
| Price/Sales (TTM) | 3.02 | The trailing twelve-month Price-to-Sales ratio compares a company's market capitalization to its revenue, indicating how much investors are paying for each dollar of sales. |
| Price/Book (MRQ) | 1.87 | The most recent quarter Price-to-Book ratio compares a company's market value to its book value, indicating how investors value its assets relative to their accounting value. |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.63 | Enterprise Value to EBITDA measures the total value of a company (including debt) relative to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, often used for comparing companies with different capital structures. |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 9.91 | The trailing twelve-month Return on Equity measures a company's profitability in relation to the equity invested by its shareholders, indicating how efficiently it generates profits from shareholder investments. |
| Operating Margin | 27.13 | The operating margin measures how much profit a company makes from its core operations for every dollar of revenue, reflecting its operational efficiency before interest and taxes. |
| Company | Market Cap (B) | P/E Ratio | P/B Ratio | Revenue Growth (%) | Operating Margin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy Corporation (Target) | 94.37 | 19.05 | 1.87 | 4.8% | 27.1% |
| Southern Company (SO) | 98.34 | 22.20 | 2.81 | 8.2% | 28.4% |
| NextEra Energy (NEE) | 183.06 | 27.22 | 3.29 | 10.7% | 28.1% |
| American Electric Power (AEP) | 63.97 | 17.52 | 2.10 | 9.3% | 26.8% |
| Sector Average | — | 22.31 | 2.73 | 9.4% | 27.8% |