⚠️ This AI-generated report synthesizes publicly available information. AI can make mistakes. Please double check information in this report.
Consumer Defensive | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
📊 THE BOTTOM LINE
Keurig Dr Pepper is a dominant player in the North American beverage and coffee market, boasting a robust portfolio of owned and partner brands. Despite a recent market cap decline, its strong brand recognition and extensive distribution network provide a solid foundation. The company is actively pursuing strategic acquisitions and potential structural changes to optimize future growth. [cite: 14, 22 Analyst Report 2025-08-26]
⚖️ RISK VS REWARD
At its current price of US$28.69, KDP trades below the average analyst target of US$34.73, suggesting potential upside. However, its significant debt load and ongoing antitrust litigation present notable risks. The risk/reward appears balanced, leaning towards favorable for investors with a long-term horizon who believe in the company's strategic initiatives. [cite: 2 Analyst Report 2025-10-27, 4 Financial Health Snapshot, 1 Price Module, 10 Significant Developments]
🚀 WHY KDP COULD SOAR
⚠️ WHAT COULD GO WRONG
U.S. Refreshment Beverages
55%
Sales of branded non-alcoholic beverages across various categories.
U.S. Coffee
31%
Sales of Keurig brewers, K-Cup pods, and ready-to-drink coffee products.
International
14%
Sales of KDP products in Canada, Mexico, and other global markets.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
KDP's diversified revenue streams across beverages and coffee, combined with its strong brand portfolio, provide resilience against shifts in consumer demand. The integrated business model, encompassing manufacturing, distribution, and brand partnerships, enhances its market reach and operational efficiency, although specific segment growth can vary. [cite: 16, 22 Analyst Report 2025-08-26]
KDP boasts over 125 owned, licensed, and partner brands, including Dr Pepper, Snapple, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, and Mott's. This broad portfolio appeals to diverse consumer tastes, while its extensive direct-store-delivery and warehouse direct distribution networks ensure widespread product availability across various retail channels in North America. This scale creates a significant barrier to entry for new competitors.
The Keurig brewing system holds a leading position in the U.S. single-serve coffee market. The patented K-Cup pod technology, coupled with a wide selection of coffee brands available for its brewers, creates a strong ecosystem. This lock-in effect fosters recurring revenue from pod sales and makes it difficult for consumers to switch to alternative brewing methods without sacrificing convenience or brand choice.
KDP's ability to forge and maintain strong partnerships with major beverage and coffee brands, such as Starbucks and Dunkin', allows it to expand its product offerings and market reach without incurring full development and marketing costs. These agreements enhance its portfolio's attractiveness and provide a competitive edge in capturing diverse consumer segments. [cite: 3 Company Profile]
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
These competitive advantages allow KDP to maintain a strong market position and drive consistent revenue streams. The combination of a broad brand portfolio, a dominant coffee system, and strategic partnerships creates a resilient business model capable of weathering shifts in consumer preferences and competitive pressures. [cite: 3 Company Profile, 14, 16]
Tim Cofer
Chief Executive Officer
Tim Cofer has served as CEO of Keurig Dr Pepper since April 2024. With 35 years of experience in the consumer packaged goods industry, he has a track record of driving growth and executing transformations for major brands. His leadership focuses on evolving the company's structure to support its next phase of growth.
The non-alcoholic beverage market is highly competitive and includes large multinational corporations, regional players, and numerous smaller, innovative brands. Competition is intense across all segments, including carbonated soft drinks, juices, and coffee, with companies vying for market share through product innovation, pricing strategies, marketing campaigns, and extensive distribution networks. Consumer preferences are also shifting towards healthier and more functional beverages.
📊 Market Context
Competitor
Description
vs KDP
Coca-Cola Co (KO)
Global beverage giant with a vast portfolio of sparkling soft drinks, water, juices, and coffee. Strong international presence.
Directly competes across many beverage categories globally. Stronger international footprint, but KDP dominates in single-serve coffee in North America.
PepsiCo Inc (PEP)
Diversified food and beverage company known for its soft drinks, snacks, and other food products. Strong brand recognition.
Competes directly in soft drinks and other beverage segments. Also has a strong snack food business, offering broader diversification than KDP.
Starbucks Corp (SBUX)
Premier roaster, marketer, and retailer of specialty coffee worldwide. Operates coffeehouses and sells products through various channels.
Competes in the ready-to-drink coffee and at-home coffee segments. KDP has licensing agreements with Starbucks for K-Cup pods, making them both partners and indirect competitors.
Keurig Dr Pepper
20%
Coca-Cola Co
25%
PepsiCo Inc
22%
Starbucks Corp
5%
Others
28%
4
9
4
Low Target
US$30
+5%
Average Target
US$35
+21%
High Target
US$42
+46%
Current: US$28.69
Medium Probability
The pending acquisition of JDE Peet's for US$18 billion could significantly expand KDP's global coffee presence and scale, potentially adding US$2-3 billion in new annual revenue and enhancing profit margins through synergies. [cite: 2 Analyst Report 2025-10-27]
High Probability
KDP's strategic investments and partnerships in high-growth areas like energy drinks (GHOST, C4 Energy) and hydration (Core Hydration, Electrolit) could capture increasing consumer demand, contributing to a 5-7% acceleration in segment revenue growth. [cite: 3 Company Profile]
Probability
Continuous innovation in K-Cup pod varieties and new beverage product launches, coupled with effective marketing for its core brands, can drive premiumization and increase per-capita consumption, leading to a 2-3% improvement in overall gross margins.
High Probability
The US$18 billion JDE Peet's acquisition will likely increase KDP's already substantial debt, potentially raising interest expenses by US$200-300 million annually and restricting funds available for other growth initiatives or shareholder returns. [cite: 2 Analyst Report 2025-10-27, 4 Financial Health Snapshot]
Medium Probability
Aggressive pricing strategies from major competitors like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, combined with the proliferation of private-label brands, could erode KDP's market share and force price reductions, potentially lowering gross profit margins by 1-2 percentage points. [cite: 18, 22 Analyst Report 2025-08-26]
Medium Probability
Dependency on global supply chains for ingredients and packaging materials exposes KDP to risks of disruptions and rising commodity costs. Sustained inflation could increase cost of goods sold by 3-5%, negatively impacting profitability if not fully offset by price increases. [cite: 22 Analyst Report 2025-08-26]
Owning KDP for a decade hinges on its ability to successfully integrate the JDE Peet's acquisition and execute its potential two-entity spinoff, creating more focused and agile businesses. The durability of its extensive brand portfolio and dominant Keurig system provides a strong foundation. However, navigating a highly competitive and evolving beverage landscape, managing its substantial debt, and ensuring consistent innovation are critical for long-term value creation. Management's strategic vision needs to translate into sustained organic growth and improved profitability beyond inorganic moves.
Metric
FY 2022
FY 2023
FY 2024
FY 2025 (Est)
FY 2026 (Est)
Income Statement
Revenue
US$14.06B
US$14.81B
US$15.35B
US$16.17B
US$16.98B
Gross Profit
US$7.32B
US$8.08B
US$8.53B
US$8.86B
US$9.29B
Operating Income
US$2.78B
US$3.19B
US$3.31B
US$3.74B
US$3.92B
Net Income
US$1.44B
US$2.18B
US$1.44B
US$2.73B
US$2.91B
EPS (Diluted)
1.01
1.55
1.05
2.01
2.14
Balance Sheet
Cash & Equivalents
US$0.54B
US$0.27B
US$0.51B
US$0.52B
US$0.53B
Total Assets
US$51.84B
US$52.13B
US$53.43B
US$54.60B
US$55.70B
Total Debt
US$13.58B
US$14.82B
US$17.27B
US$17.55B
US$17.90B
Shareholders' Equity
US$25.13B
US$25.68B
US$24.24B
US$25.32B
US$25.80B
Key Ratios
Gross Margin
52.1%
54.5%
55.6%
54.8%
54.8%
Operating Margin
19.8%
21.6%
21.6%
23.1%
23.1%
Debt to Equity
5.72
8.49
5.94
73.57
73.57
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.73 | The trailing twelve-month Price-to-Earnings ratio indicates how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of past earnings, reflecting current market sentiment towards the company's profitability. [cite: 2 Summary Detail Module] |
| Forward P/E | 14.00 | The forward Price-to-Earnings ratio uses estimated future earnings to gauge how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of anticipated future earnings, offering insight into future growth expectations. [cite: 2 Summary Detail Module] |
| PEG Ratio | N/A | The PEG ratio compares the P/E ratio to the earnings growth rate, providing a more comprehensive valuation picture by accounting for future earnings growth potential. [cite: 12 Default Key Statistics] |
| Price/Sales (TTM) | 2.41 | The trailing twelve-month Price-to-Sales ratio evaluates a company's stock price relative to its revenue, useful for valuing companies with inconsistent earnings or those in early growth stages. [cite: 2 Summary Detail Module] |
| Price/Book (MRQ) | 1.51 | The most recent quarter's Price-to-Book ratio compares the market value of a company's stock to its book value, indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of net assets. [cite: 12 Default Key Statistics] |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.12 | Enterprise Value to EBITDA measures the total value of a company, including debt, relative to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, often used for valuing capital-intensive businesses. [cite: 12 Default Key Statistics] |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 0.06 | Trailing twelve-month Return on Equity indicates how efficiently a company is using shareholders' investments to generate profits, reflecting its profitability and capital management effectiveness. [cite: 4 Financial Health Snapshot] |
| Operating Margin | 0.23 | Operating Margin measures the percentage of revenue remaining after deducting operating expenses, indicating a company's operational efficiency and profitability from its core business activities. [cite: 4 Financial Health Snapshot] |
| Company | Market Cap (B) | P/E Ratio | P/B Ratio | Revenue Growth (%) | Operating Margin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (Target) | 38.98 | 24.73 | 1.51 | 10.7% | 23.1% |
| Coca-Cola Co (KO) | 257.45 | 22.87 | 9.07 | 2.8% | 27.8% |
| PepsiCo Inc (PEP) | 200.90 | 28.10 | 10.20 | 0.5% | 16.9% |
| Starbucks Corp (SBUX) | 96.70 | 52.24 | 2.63 | 2.8% | 10.5% |
| Sector Average | — | 34.40 | 7.30 | 2.0% | 18.4% |