⚠️ This AI-generated report synthesizes publicly available information. AI can make mistakes. Please double check information in this report.
Healthcare | Drug Manufacturers - General
📊 The Bottom Line
Eli Lilly is a pharmaceutical giant with a strong focus on innovative therapies, particularly in diabetes and obesity, areas with significant unmet needs and high growth potential. The company boasts a robust pipeline and established market leadership with several blockbuster drugs. Its strategic collaborations and R&D commitment underpin a solid business model.
⚖️ Risk vs Reward
At its current valuation, Eli Lilly trades at a premium reflecting its strong growth prospects, especially from its GLP-1 agonists. The potential for further pipeline success and market expansion offers substantial upside, though this must be weighed against risks like intense competition, regulatory hurdles, and patent expiry. The risk/reward profile is considered attractive for long-term growth investors.
🚀 Why LLY Could Soar
⚠️ What Could Go Wrong
Revenue breakdown not available for this company type
%
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
Eli Lilly's business model is characterized by significant upfront R&D investment for potential high-margin returns from groundbreaking therapies. The ability to consistently innovate and effectively bring new medicines to market is crucial for sustained growth and profitability in the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry.
Eli Lilly has a long history of pharmaceutical innovation, particularly in areas like diabetes and, more recently, obesity. Its robust R&D pipeline consistently delivers groundbreaking therapies like Mounjaro and Zepbound, which are rapidly gaining market share. This pioneering spirit allows the company to address significant unmet medical needs and establish early leadership in emerging therapeutic categories, driving substantial revenue growth.
Eli Lilly relies heavily on its extensive portfolio of patents covering its novel drugs. These patents provide legal exclusivity for a significant period, safeguarding its investment in R&D and allowing the company to command premium pricing without immediate generic competition. This intellectual property protection is a critical moat, ensuring high gross margins and sustained profitability for its blockbuster products.
With operations in the United States, Europe, China, Japan, and internationally, Eli Lilly possesses a vast global commercial infrastructure. This extensive reach enables efficient drug distribution, marketing, and sales across diverse healthcare systems. The ability to rapidly scale new product launches globally and penetrate key markets provides a significant advantage over smaller, less established pharmaceutical companies.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
Eli Lilly's blend of scientific innovation, intellectual property, and global commercialization capabilities creates a powerful and durable competitive advantage. This allows the company to not only develop but also successfully bring life-changing medicines to patients worldwide, securing strong market positions and driving long-term shareholder value.
David A. Ricks
Chairman & CEO
David A. Ricks, 57, serves as Chairman and CEO. He joined Eli Lilly in 1996 and has held various leadership roles globally before becoming CEO in 2017. Ricks has steered the company towards a greater focus on innovative drug development, particularly in chronic diseases, overseeing the successful launch of key growth products. His strategic vision has been central to Lilly's recent market outperformance and pipeline expansion.
The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, characterized by intense research and development, robust intellectual property protection, and stringent regulatory environments. Key competitors range from large multinational pharmaceutical companies with diverse portfolios to specialized biotech firms. Competition is driven primarily by drug efficacy, safety, pricing, market access, and the speed of bringing innovative therapies to market.
📊 Market Context
Competitor
Description
vs LLY
Novo Nordisk
Danish pharmaceutical company, a global leader in diabetes and obesity care with popular GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy.
Direct competitor in the high-growth GLP-1 market, often seen as a head-to-head rival in diabetes and obesity treatment with similar drug classes.
Johnson & Johnson
Diversified healthcare giant with pharmaceutical, medical device, and consumer health segments. Strong presence in oncology, immunology, and neuroscience.
Broader portfolio and diversified revenue streams; competes in several therapeutic areas with Eli Lilly but has less focused exposure to GLP-1s.
Merck & Co., Inc.
Global pharmaceutical company known for its oncology, vaccine, and infectious disease portfolios, including blockbuster cancer treatments.
Competes in oncology with Eli Lilly, but has a different strategic focus with less direct overlap in the cardiometabolic disease space.
1
7
17
4
Low Target
US$770
-26%
Average Target
US$1146
+11%
High Target
US$1500
+45%
Closing: US$1037.15 (30 Jan 2026)
High Probability
Continued strong demand and market penetration of Mounjaro and Zepbound could exceed current growth expectations, adding billions in annual revenue and driving significant EPS expansion.
Medium Probability
Further successful clinical trials and regulatory approvals for drugs like Retatrutide and Orforglipron would significantly expand future revenue streams, potentially adding new blockbuster franchises.
High Probability
Ongoing investment in R&D and key partnerships, including recent collaborations in AI drug discovery, could unlock new therapeutic areas and maintain a strong competitive edge, fostering long-term innovation.
Medium Probability
Aggressive competition from rivals developing similar GLP-1 agonists (e.g., Novo Nordisk) could lead to pricing pressure, market share erosion, and slower-than-expected growth rates in key markets.
Medium Probability
Delays or unexpected negative outcomes in clinical trials or regulatory approval processes for key pipeline assets could impact drug launches and significantly reduce future revenue forecasts.
Low Probability
Future patent expirations on blockbuster drugs could open the door to generic versions, reducing Eli Lilly's market exclusivity and significantly impacting profitability margins over time.
Eli Lilly presents a compelling case for long-term ownership if its innovation engine, particularly in chronic diseases like obesity and diabetes, continues to deliver. The robust pipeline and strong patent protection offer a durable moat. Key risks include the rapid evolution of the competitive landscape, potential regulatory shifts for new drug classes, and the ongoing challenge of maintaining R&D productivity. Management's consistent strategic execution has been a strength, but sustained success depends on continued scientific breakthroughs and effective commercialization to offset eventual patent expiries.
Metric
31 Dec 2024
31 Dec 2023
31 Dec 2022
Income Statement
Revenue
US$45.04B
US$34.12B
US$28.54B
Gross Profit
US$36.62B
US$27.04B
US$21.91B
Operating Income
US$17.04B
US$10.33B
US$8.28B
Net Income
US$10.59B
US$5.24B
US$6.24B
EPS (Diluted)
11.71
5.80
6.57
Balance Sheet
Cash & Equivalents
US$3.27B
US$2.82B
US$2.07B
Total Assets
US$78.71B
US$64.01B
US$49.49B
Total Debt
US$33.64B
US$25.23B
US$16.24B
Shareholders' Equity
US$14.19B
US$10.77B
US$10.65B
Key Ratios
Gross Margin
81.3%
79.2%
76.8%
Operating Margin
37.8%
30.3%
29.0%
Return on Equity
74.62
48.65
58.64
Metric
Annual (31 Dec 2025)
Annual (31 Dec 2026)
EPS Estimate
US$23.63
US$33.22
EPS Growth
+81.9%
+40.5%
Revenue Estimate
US$63.8B
US$77.5B
Revenue Growth
+41.7%
+21.4%
Number of Analysts
25
26
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 50.25 | The trailing Price-to-Earnings ratio measures the current share price relative to the company's earnings per share over the past 12 months, indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. |
| Forward P/E | 31.22 | The forward Price-to-Earnings ratio uses estimated future earnings, offering a perspective on valuation based on expected profitability. |
| Price/Sales (TTM) | 15.65 | The trailing Price-to-Sales ratio compares the company's market capitalization to its revenue over the past 12 months, useful for valuing companies with low or negative earnings. |
| Price/Book (MRQ) | 39.05 | The Price-to-Book ratio compares the market value of a company's stock to its book value per share, indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of net assets. |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.46 | Enterprise Value to EBITDA is a valuation multiple that compares the total value of a company to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, often used for comparing companies across different capital structures. |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 0.96 | Return on Equity measures the net income returned as a percentage of shareholders' equity, revealing how efficiently a company is generating profits from its equity investments. |
| Operating Margin | 0.48 | Operating Margin indicates how much profit a company makes from its operations after paying for variable costs but before interest and taxes, reflecting operational efficiency. |