⚠️ This AI-generated report synthesizes publicly available information. AI can make mistakes. Please double check information in this report.
Industrials | Specialty Industrial Machinery
📊 The Bottom Line
NuScale Power is a pioneer in small modular reactor (SMR) technology, offering a promising solution for clean energy. While the long-term potential is substantial, the company faces significant execution risks and operates at a heavy loss in its development phase. Its proprietary technology could be a game-changer for the energy sector.
⚖️ Risk vs Reward
At US$12.14, NuScale Power presents a high-risk, high-reward proposition. Significant upside exists with successful SMR deployment and regulatory approvals, potentially reaching analysts' high target of US$28. The downside is substantial due to heavy cash burn and project execution uncertainties, with a low target of US$8 reflecting these risks.
🚀 Why SMR Could Soar
⚠️ What Could Go Wrong
Engineering & Project Development
60%
Revenue from design, development, and project management services for SMR deployment.
Licensing & Regulatory Support
30%
Income derived from providing licensing basis information and regulatory compliance assistance.
Other Services & Contracts
10%
Miscellaneous service contracts, training, and early-stage consulting engagements.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
NuScale's revenue model relies heavily on the successful commercialization and broad adoption of its proprietary SMR technology. The long sales cycles and regulatory complexities inherent in the nuclear industry mean significant upfront investment before substantial recurring revenue streams are established.
NuScale's patented NuScale Power Module (NPM) represents a cutting-edge approach to nuclear power generation, offering smaller, more flexible, and potentially safer reactors. This technology is the first SMR to receive design approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, providing a significant competitive and regulatory lead in a nascent industry. Its innovative design streamlines construction and reduces siting requirements.
Being the first to achieve U.S. NRC design approval for an SMR is a monumental achievement, creating a substantial barrier to entry for competitors. The rigorous and lengthy regulatory process means NuScale has a significant head start, allowing it to move towards commercial deployment while others are still in earlier approval stages. This approval lends credibility and reduces regulatory uncertainty for potential customers.
NuScale has established strategic partnerships, such as with Ebara Elliott Energy for industrial compressor development, which is crucial for testing and demonstrating power modules. These collaborations help de-risk technology development, leverage external expertise, and build out a robust supply chain network. Such alliances are vital for manufacturing, deployment, and global market penetration, offering operational efficiencies and shared development costs.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
NuScale's unique SMR technology, coupled with its significant regulatory lead and strategic partnerships, positions it as a potential leader in the emerging advanced nuclear market. These advantages are crucial for navigating the high barriers to entry and long development cycles characteristic of the nuclear energy sector, offering a foundation for long-term growth and profitability.
John Lawrence Hopkins
President, CEO & Director
John Lawrence Hopkins, 71, leads NuScale Power as President and CEO. A seasoned executive in the energy sector, he guides the company's strategy and commercialization efforts for small modular reactors. His extensive experience is critical for navigating the complex regulatory landscape and developing innovative nuclear energy solutions for global markets.
The SMR market is nascent but rapidly evolving, characterized by a few key players vying for regulatory approvals and initial project deployments. Competition is based on technology maturity, safety features, cost-effectiveness, scalability, and government support. The market is currently consolidating around a few proven designs, with substantial capital and regulatory hurdles for new entrants.
📊 Market Context
Competitor
Description
vs SMR
GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy
Developer of the BWRX-300, a boiling water SMR, leveraging extensive experience in nuclear plant design and construction.
Competes with a different SMR design, utilizing a larger installed base within traditional nuclear power, offering a potentially faster path to market due to established infrastructure.
Rolls-Royce SMR
A consortium aiming to deliver a factory-built SMR power plant, focusing on cost-effective, standardized units.
Focuses on a standardized, modular construction approach for rapid deployment, potentially offering lower capital costs per unit than NuScale's current model, targeting diverse markets.
TerraPower
Founded by Bill Gates, developing advanced nuclear reactors like the Natrium fast reactor, emphasizing innovative fuel cycles and waste reduction.
Differentiates with advanced reactor designs and alternative fuel technologies, aiming for enhanced safety and efficiency, representing a longer-term, more disruptive competitive threat.
1
1
9
5
1
Low Target
US$8
-34%
Average Target
US$17
+40%
High Target
US$28
+131%
Closing: US$12.14 (1 May 2026)
Medium Probability
Successful initial deployment and operation of NuScale's SMRs in projects like the Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) could validate the technology, leading to a cascade of new orders and significantly accelerating revenue growth to billions of US$ annually.
Medium Probability
Beyond initial U.S. projects, NuScale's SMRs could find significant demand in Europe, Asia, and other regions facing energy security and decarbonization challenges. This global expansion could unlock a multi-trillion dollar market, vastly expanding NuScale's addressable market.
High Probability
Increasing global recognition of nuclear power's role in climate change mitigation could lead to substantial government grants, loan guarantees, and favorable regulatory policies, providing NuScale with critical financial support and reducing project financing burdens.
High Probability
The nuclear industry is notorious for project delays and cost overruns. Any significant setbacks in NuScale's demonstration projects could erode investor confidence, deplete capital reserves, and push back revenue generation, potentially requiring further dilutive equity raises.
Medium Probability
As the SMR market develops, more competitors with alternative designs may emerge. This could lead to pricing pressure, longer sales cycles, and reduced market share for NuScale, impacting long-term profitability and growth prospects.
High Probability
Despite U.S. NRC approval, deploying SMRs globally will require navigating diverse and stringent regulatory regimes. Public apprehension about nuclear safety and waste disposal could also create political hurdles, delaying or canceling projects and limiting adoption.
Owning NuScale Power for a decade hinges on the successful commercialization and widespread adoption of SMR technology. If NuScale can overcome initial deployment challenges, secure consistent regulatory approvals, and scale its manufacturing, its proprietary technology offers immense potential for reliable, clean energy. The key is execution in a capital-intensive and highly regulated industry. Failure to manage project timelines and costs, or significant shifts in global energy policy away from nuclear, could severely derail the long-term thesis. This is a bet on the future of advanced nuclear power.
Metric
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
31 Dec 2023
Income Statement
Revenue
US$0.03B
US$0.04B
US$0.02B
Gross Profit
US$0.01B
US$0.03B
US$0.00B
Operating Income
US$-0.69B
US$-0.14B
US$-0.28B
Net Income
US$-0.36B
US$-0.14B
US$-0.06B
EPS (Diluted)
0.00
-1.47
-0.80
Balance Sheet
Cash & Equivalents
US$0.84B
US$0.40B
US$0.12B
Total Assets
US$1.41B
US$0.54B
US$0.22B
Total Debt
US$0.00B
US$0.00B
US$0.00B
Shareholders' Equity
US$1.17B
US$0.62B
US$0.09B
Key Ratios
Gross Margin
36.3%
86.7%
16.9%
Operating Margin
-2190.6%
-374.5%
-1208.1%
Return on Equity
-30.44
-22.08
-62.45
Metric
Annual (31 Dec 2026)
Annual (31 Dec 2027)
EPS Estimate
US$-0.53
US$-0.50
EPS Growth
+75.5%
+6.2%
Revenue Estimate
US$0.1B
US$0.2B
Revenue Growth
+142.0%
+131.6%
Number of Analysts
8
6
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -5.59 | Indicates how many times earnings investors are willing to pay for the stock over the past twelve months. A negative value suggests the company is currently unprofitable. |
| Forward P/E | -28.29 | Estimates how many times future earnings investors are willing to pay for the stock, providing insight into expected profitability. A negative value indicates anticipated future losses. |
| Price/Sales (TTM) | 124.85 | Measures the price investors are willing to pay for each dollar of revenue over the past twelve months, often used for companies with inconsistent earnings. |
| Price/Book (MRQ) | 3.31 | Compares the stock's market price to its book value per share, indicating how investors value the company's assets on its balance sheet. |
| EV/EBITDA | -14.13 | Calculates the enterprise value relative to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. A negative value is common for unprofitable, development-stage companies. |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -0.85 | Measures the profitability of a company in relation to the equity invested by shareholders over the trailing twelve months. A negative value indicates net losses. |
| Operating Margin | -33.38 | Represents the percentage of revenue left after paying for operating expenses, indicating the company's operational efficiency. A negative margin signifies operating losses. |