⚠️ This AI-generated report synthesizes publicly available information. AI can make mistakes. Please double check information in this report.
Consumer Defensive | Household & Personal Products
📊 The Bottom Line
Procter & Gamble is a diversified consumer defensive giant with a portfolio of leading global brands. Its robust market position, consistent profitability, and strong free cash flow generation make it a stable, dividend-paying investment, though growth may be moderate due to its scale.
⚖️ Risk vs Reward
At US$151.77, PG trades below the average analyst target of US$167.45. The stock offers defensive stability and a solid dividend yield. Upside is supported by brand strength and efficiency gains, while risks include evolving consumer preferences and commodity cost pressures. The risk/reward appears balanced for long-term investors.
🚀 Why PG Could Soar
⚠️ What Could Go Wrong
Fabric & Home Care
35%
Includes laundry detergents, fabric enhancers, dish care, and air fresheners.
Baby, Feminine & Family Care
25%
Comprises diapers, wipes, feminine care, and paper products.
Health Care
15%
Offers oral care products, digestive wellness, and other personal health care.
Beauty
15%
Includes hair care, skin & personal care products.
Grooming
10%
Consists of shaving products and appliances.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
P&G's diversified brand portfolio provides stability and resilience across various consumer needs. This broad reach and strong brand loyalty allow the company to maintain market leadership and consistent pricing power, even in fluctuating economic conditions.
P&G owns an unparalleled collection of household brands like Tide, Gillette, Pampers, and Crest, recognized and trusted globally. This allows premium pricing, strong customer loyalty, and significant marketing efficiency. The emotional connection consumers have with these established brands creates a strong barrier to entry for competitors.
Operating in over 180 countries, P&G leverages its immense scale in manufacturing, procurement, and logistics. This enables cost efficiencies, strong negotiation power with retailers, and deep market penetration that smaller competitors cannot easily replicate, ensuring products are widely available and competitively priced.
P&G invests heavily in research and development, continuously innovating its product lines to meet evolving consumer demands and improve performance. This focus on innovation, backed by significant financial resources, helps maintain product superiority and differentiate its offerings from competitors, justifying premium pricing.
🎯 WHY THIS MATTERS
These advantages collectively create a formidable moat, allowing P&G to command dominant market positions and generate consistent free cash flow. This enables sustained investment in brand building and innovation, reinforcing its competitive lead in the consumer goods sector.
Shailesh G. Jejurikar
CEO, President & Director
Shailesh G. Jejurikar, aged 57, serves as P&G's CEO, President, and Director. His leadership focuses on driving innovation, expanding into key growth markets, and maintaining operational efficiency across P&G's extensive global portfolio. He is instrumental in shaping the company's long-term strategic direction in the competitive consumer goods industry.
The household and personal products market is highly competitive, characterized by large multinational corporations, agile smaller brands, and private label offerings. Competition is based on brand reputation, product innovation, pricing, and distribution reach, with consumer loyalty being a key battleground.
📊 Market Context
Competitor
Description
vs PG
Unilever PLC
Anglo-Dutch multinational consumer goods company, offering food, beverages, cleaning agents, and personal care products. Diversified portfolio.
Direct competitor in many categories, particularly beauty, home care, and personal care. Similar scale but P&G generally has higher margins.
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Global consumer product company focused on oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition. Strong presence in toothpaste and soap.
Directly competes with P&G's oral care (Crest vs Colgate) and personal care (Secret vs Palmolive) brands. Smaller market cap but specialized.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Multinational personal care corporation that produces paper-based consumer products, including Kleenex, Kotex, and Huggies.
Primary competitor in baby care (Huggies vs Pampers) and feminine care (Kotex vs Always/Tampax). Focused portfolio in paper-based products.
Pampers (P&G)
30%
Huggies (Kimberly-Clark)
20%
Others
50%
10
9
5
Low Target
US$148
-2%
Average Target
US$167
+10%
High Target
US$186
+23%
Closing: US$151.77 (30 Jan 2026)
High Probability
P&G's focus on premium products and innovation allows for higher pricing and improved margins. This strategy, if successful, could drive organic sales growth of 3-5% annually and expand gross margins by 50-100 basis points, leading to stronger EPS growth.
Medium Probability
Deepening penetration in rapidly growing emerging markets, particularly in Asia and Latin America, could unlock significant new revenue streams. Expanding distribution and tailoring products to local needs could add 2-3% to annual top-line growth.
High Probability
Continued investment in e-commerce capabilities and direct-to-consumer channels can enhance brand engagement and capture a larger share of online sales. This could reduce reliance on traditional retail, improve data insights, and potentially boost operating margins by 20-30 basis points.
Medium Probability
Aggressive competition from private label brands and smaller, agile direct-to-consumer players could lead to market share erosion and pricing pressure. This might force P&G to increase promotional spending, potentially lowering gross margins by 50-100 basis points.
High Probability
Fluctuations in raw material costs (e.g., pulp, resins, energy) can significantly impact profitability. Unfavorable commodity price movements, if not fully offset by price increases or efficiencies, could compress operating margins by 75-150 basis points.
Medium Probability
A rapid shift in consumer preferences towards highly specialized, natural, or environmentally sustainable products could disrupt P&G's traditional brand strength. Failure to adapt quickly could result in slower organic sales growth and increased R&D costs to innovate new offerings.
If you believe premium consumers will continue to value trusted household brands for the next decade, Procter & Gamble's moat appears durable. The flywheel of brand loyalty, global distribution, and innovation typically strengthens over time. The key challenge is sustaining growth in mature markets while navigating competitive pressures. However, P&G's proven ability to innovate and optimize its portfolio makes it a compelling candidate for a decade-long hold, provided management continues its agile strategic execution.
Metric
30 Jun 2025
30 Jun 2024
30 Jun 2023
Income Statement
Revenue
US$84.28B
US$84.04B
US$0.00B
Gross Profit
US$43.12B
US$43.19B
US$0.00B
Operating Income
US$20.45B
US$19.89B
US$0.00B
Net Income
US$15.97B
US$14.88B
US$0.00B
EPS (Diluted)
6.51
6.02
0.00
Balance Sheet
Cash & Equivalents
US$9.56B
US$9.48B
US$8.25B
Total Assets
US$125.23B
US$122.37B
US$120.83B
Total Debt
US$35.46B
US$33.37B
US$35.42B
Shareholders' Equity
US$52.01B
US$50.29B
US$46.78B
Key Ratios
Gross Margin
51.2%
51.4%
0.0%
Operating Margin
24.3%
23.7%
0.0%
Return on Equity
30.71
29.59
0.00
Metric
Annual (30 Jun 2026)
Annual (30 Jun 2027)
EPS Estimate
US$6.97
US$7.32
EPS Growth
+2.0%
+5.0%
Revenue Estimate
US$86.6B
US$89.0B
Revenue Growth
+2.8%
+2.8%
Number of Analysts
21
21
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.22 | The trailing price-to-earnings ratio measures the current share price relative to the company's earnings per share over the past twelve months, indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. |
| Forward P/E | 20.74 | The forward price-to-earnings ratio uses estimated future earnings, offering an indication of a company's future earnings potential relative to its current share price. |
| Price/Sales (TTM) | 4.16 | The price-to-sales ratio compares the company's market capitalization to its total revenue over the past twelve months, often used for valuing companies with inconsistent earnings. |
| Price/Book (MRQ) | 6.75 | The price-to-book ratio compares the company's market value to its book value (assets minus liabilities), indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of net assets. |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.33 | Enterprise Value to EBITDA is a valuation multiple that compares the total value of a company to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, often used for comparing companies across different capital structures. |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 31.56 | Return on Equity (ROE) measures the profitability of a company in relation to the equity invested by its shareholders, indicating how efficiently management is using equity to generate profits. |
| Operating Margin | 26.30 | Operating margin measures how much profit a company makes on each dollar of sales after covering variable costs of production, providing insight into operational efficiency. |
| Company | Market Cap (B) | P/E Ratio | P/B Ratio | Revenue Growth (%) | Operating Margin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Procter & Gamble Company (Target) | 354650000000.00 | 22.22 | 6.75 | 1.5% | 26.3% |
| Unilever PLC | 130000000000.00 | 19.50 | 5.50 | 3.5% | 16.0% |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company | 65000000000.00 | 26.00 | 21.00 | 2.5% | 21.0% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 45000000000.00 | 19.00 | 9.00 | 1.5% | 16.0% |
| Sector Average | — | 21.50 | 11.83 | 2.5% | 17.7% |